The Planning Commission will hold a public hearing on Tuesday, August 17th to discuss changing requirements for exterior building colors. Currently, Ivins requires building exterior colors to be muted, earth tones. When they discussed this at their June 15th meeting it appeared that members of the Planning Commission, except for Lance Anderson, were in favor of loosening color requirements to allow for much lighter colors. However, they have not reached a final decision, so this is our opportunity to help them with useful suggestions.
The building color requirements Ivins has had for a number of years have helped Ivins develop its own unique character. I believe that character, and the building colors that help shape it, are appreciated by most residents. Our General Plan speaks to this, stating “Encourage architecture, lighting, landscaping and the use of colors that blend with the natural surroundings, and Encourage residential design that complements the natural beauty and character of the area.”
Building color is an important visual language that everyone understands; a sensory perception that affects our emotions in many ways. Light, unmuted colors don’t blend with our natural surroundings. Our color requirements have worked well in Ivins for years and helped to create a unique and cohesive character for our city.
However, the written requirements could stand modification. Here is a suggestion for the meeting, and suggestions for changes to the 3 requirements:
Meeting suggestion: Have a color wheel(s) or chart(s) or color chips available in the Planning Commission meeting. That way everyone will have real, concrete examples to look at rather than trying to imagine the colors or look at them on phones or computers which won’t render the colors as accurately and are difficult to share with others in the meeting.
- Requirement 1 – Minimize Impact: “All building materials and colors shall minimize the impact of buildings on the natural setting. All building colors shall be earth tones and muted colors that blend and do not contrast with natural desert colors. Wall extensions from buildings, and all walls and fences, shall be the same or similar color and materials as the main building.”
- Suggestion: The City could have on hand a color wheel/chart that shows the options acceptable to the City. Then everyone can SEE what is acceptable.
- Requirement 2 – Light Reflective Value (LRV): “The LRV of materials used on all exterior walls shall be between seven (7) (darkest value of shaded vegetation) and thirty eight (38) (approximate value of red sandstone and soil in the city). Generally, the more visible the structure, the lower its LRV should be.”
- Suggestion: LRV is a technical term, but it is extremely useful. Paint companies provide the LRV for their colors, making it easy to meet the rules by finding out the LRV for a selected color. Determine if the current LRV range is appropriate by selecting colors from actual color wheels, charts, chips that meet the other two requirements and the General Plan’s goals and use the range of those selected colors.
- Requirement 3 – Color Intensity And Brightness: “The strength, intensity, and brightness of the color selected (chroma) shall be in the range from very weak (grayish) to medium weak (neutral or earth tone). Strong chroma colors should be avoided. Stains and flat paints are encouraged.”
- Suggestion: “Very weak and medium weak” are not measurable criteria. Instead, state that all colors must be muted. Color wheels, charts, and/or chips are the easiest way for everyone to understand what is acceptable.
If the Planning Commission decides to recommend lighter colors or colors that fall outside of these three requirements, then I believe that should require changes to the General Plan. And I believe the General Plan should only be changed after a significant amount of public input over an extended period, to ensure the opportunity for most residents to weigh in on any new vision for our community.
I believe it would help the Planning Commission if you shared your thoughts, concerns, and ideas in an email to them before Tuesday’s meeting (jloris@ivins.com, bpack@ivins.com, landerson@ivins.com, dclifford@ivins.com, bmorris@ivins.com). Even better, attend the meeting on Tuesday and give your input during the public hearing. The meeting starts at 5:30pm and this issue is the first thing on the agenda.
Please share your comments and tell me about other Ivins issues I have not addressed in recent posts. CONTACT ME
Recent “Development” posts
- The Housing Debate Is Comparing Apples To WatermelonsPDF đź“„The Legislature’s focus on housing affordability is understandable. Home prices have far outpaced incomes across Utah, and that’s a real challenge for families. But in trying to solve that one problem, lawmakers are putting on blinders to everything else that good planning protects. Housing isn’t built in a vacuum. When the Legislature’s only lens…
- Utah’s Housing Plan: Hope or Worry?PDF đź“„The State released a draft Housing Strategic Plan last week, asking cities to provide feedback before it’s finalized and presented to the Legislature. (Download the Plan) I’ll admit, I approached my review of the Plan with low expectations. In recent years, housing policy discussions at the state level have leaned toward mandates, one-size-fits-all rules…
- Red Mountain Resort: What’s Next For Ivins?PDF đź“„At last week’s City Council meeting, Black Desert Resort presented a proposed development agreement for the Red Mountain Resort property. The concept is to redevelop the existing resort on 56.5 acres with up to 500 “visitor lodging” units managed as part of a destination resort, plus an unspecified amount of related commercial space. About…
- Ongoing Blasting at Black Desert ResortPDF đź“„Black Desert Resort is currently conducting regular blasting to excavate lava rock for an underground parking structure. The blasting occurs at least a couple times a week and has been underway for several months, with at least a few more months to go. During this afternoon’s blast, I was a few hundred feet from…
- My Take on Growth, Roads, Water, & MorePDF đź“„Robert MacFarlane, an Ivins resident who pays a lot of attention to local issues and hosts the 435 Podcast sent a questionnaire to all city council candidates in the county. I wrote detailed responses to all seven questions, but they were too big and blew up his online survey form. So I redid those responses as…