The Planning Commission will hold a public hearing and consider recommending changes to the City’s Subdivision Ordinance at its July 13th meeting. Sounds like an exciting topic, doesn’t it? Of course not! But it is. It contains two particularly important changes. One change addresses the City’s ability to control development. The other change gives the City some flexibility over water concerns.
Wrestling with the State
At a recent Planning Commission meeting City Manager Dale Coulam explained that the State has now eliminated the ability for cities to regulate many building design elements for one- and two-family homes. Ivins can still regulate design elements for townhomes, multifamily and commercial development. And HOAs can regulate design elements, including building color, in their CC&Rs.
Even so, this significantly interferes with cities’ ability to control their own destiny.
But Dale suggested a possible solution. He said the City could change the subdivision ordinance to require development agreements for all new subdivisions. That way the City could still control design requirements. Currently, development agreements are only required when a developer asks for a density bonus.
So, the Planning Commission will hold a public hearing and consider recommending a change to the Subdivision Ordinance at its July 13th meeting. The change Dale proposes would require all subdivision applications enter into a Development Agreement with the City. Among other things, the Development Agreement can require the development to follow current design guidelines.
Thanks to Dale’s creativity, this is a good solution to a bad problem that should never have happened. The State was wrong to take control away from cities. Ivins is not Santa Clara, or Hurricane, or Springdale. Each city has its own unique character. And that is a good thing. This would take control back from the State for most new development. And, significantly, Ivins is doing this quickly. We just lost control at the beginning of July, and we could get it back in a couple of weeks. Let’s hope the State does not try to fight this. Shame on them if they did.
Wrestling with Mother Nature
But wait, there’s more. The second change Dale proposes would include a disclaimer in these Development Agreements for all new subdivisions, saying, “…there may not be sufficient water to serve lots and/or phases in the future and that decision will be made at time of building permit application.”
Here is how I read this sentence. Often, developers come in with a concept plan long before they are ready to submit for their permit. I believe the City takes the position that it is bound to honor that project once the concept plan has been submitted and follow through by issuing a permit as long as the developer is not asking for anything special. But our water situation could change significantly between the initial concept plan and the final permit application. This gives the City flexibility to deal with whatever new information it has.
If the Planning Commission recommends approval of these changes, then hopefully this will be in front of the City Council in a couple of weeks and they will approve the changes. If so, even though this is just one small step on a large water issue, it is a step, so that along with taking back development control deserves a “Bravo Ivins!”
Please share your comments and tell me about other Ivins issues I have not addressed in recent posts. CONTACT ME
Recent “Development” posts
- The Housing Debate Is Comparing Apples To WatermelonsPDF 📄The Legislature’s focus on housing affordability is understandable. Home prices have far outpaced incomes across Utah, and that’s a real challenge for families. But in trying to solve that one problem, lawmakers are putting on blinders to everything else that good planning protects. Housing isn’t built in a vacuum. When the Legislature’s only lens…
- Utah’s Housing Plan: Hope or Worry?PDF 📄The State released a draft Housing Strategic Plan last week, asking cities to provide feedback before it’s finalized and presented to the Legislature. (Download the Plan) I’ll admit, I approached my review of the Plan with low expectations. In recent years, housing policy discussions at the state level have leaned toward mandates, one-size-fits-all rules…
- Red Mountain Resort: What’s Next For Ivins?PDF 📄At last week’s City Council meeting, Black Desert Resort presented a proposed development agreement for the Red Mountain Resort property. The concept is to redevelop the existing resort on 56.5 acres with up to 500 “visitor lodging” units managed as part of a destination resort, plus an unspecified amount of related commercial space. About…
- Ongoing Blasting at Black Desert ResortPDF 📄Black Desert Resort is currently conducting regular blasting to excavate lava rock for an underground parking structure. The blasting occurs at least a couple times a week and has been underway for several months, with at least a few more months to go. During this afternoon’s blast, I was a few hundred feet from…
- My Take on Growth, Roads, Water, & MorePDF 📄Robert MacFarlane, an Ivins resident who pays a lot of attention to local issues and hosts the 435 Podcast sent a questionnaire to all city council candidates in the county. I wrote detailed responses to all seven questions, but they were too big and blew up his online survey form. So I redid those responses as…
Recent “Water” posts
- Shocked and Dismayed: Still No Drought PlanPDF 📄Back in April, the Washington County Water Conservancy District’s (WCWCD’s) Administrative Advisory Committee finally voted to recommend adoption of a Water Shortage Contingency Plan. That should have been the breakthrough moment. Instead, here we are in September, and now we’re told the plan may not be finalized until the end of 2025. That’s after…
- My Take on Growth, Roads, Water, & MorePDF 📄Robert MacFarlane, an Ivins resident who pays a lot of attention to local issues and hosts the 435 Podcast sent a questionnaire to all city council candidates in the county. I wrote detailed responses to all seven questions, but they were too big and blew up his online survey form. So I redid those responses as…
- Closer To a Drought Plan?PDF 📄Today, the Washington County Water Conservancy District’s (WCWCD’s) Administrative Advisory Committee (AAC) voted to recommend adoption of a long-overdue Water Shortage Contingency Plan, but there’s a twist. (Download draft plan) (Download presentation explaining the plan) Collectively, they agreed that the action steps in the plan need to be modified, but individually it appears they…
- Down the Drain or Back Again? The Future of WastewaterPDF 📄Last night, Peter Annin, author of Purified and a leading expert on water recycling, gave a presentation organized by Conserve Southwest Utah on how communities across the country are rethinking wastewater—and how Washington County could, too. Annin highlighted case studies from places that have successfully turned wastewater into a reliable water source, including cities…
- Parched Today, Prepared Tomorrow: The Need for Drought PlanningPDF 📄As we experience the driest water year in at least 42 years, the need for a clear, effective drought contingency plan for Washington County and its cities has never been more urgent. For over three years, the Washington County Water Conservancy District (WCWCD) has been working on a plan, but getting eight cities to…