The State Legislature gave cities a little more enforcement power this year through House Bill 256, which outlines clear steps cities can take when short-term rentals (STRs) operate in zones where they aren’t allowed. This includes issuing warnings, requesting that online listings be removed, and imposing fines if violations aren’t corrected. The Legislature didn’t give us as much as I had hoped, but something is better than nothing.
Ivins allows STRs in a few designated overlay areas, as well as in Resort Commercial, Resort Mixed Use, and Commercial Resort areas. But they are not allowed in most residential parts of the city.
Here’s the catch: while Ivins has a good system for deciding where STRs are permitted, our current code doesn’t clearly spell out how short-term rentals must operate — things like proof of taxes being paid, garbage removal standards, or manager accountability.
Washington City recently updated its STR ordinances to deal with similar gaps — adding new requirements like posting emergency contacts inside the rental, requiring annual proof of transient room tax payments, and making sure STR managers are properly licensed and close by.
I believe it’s time for Ivins to review and update our short-term rental ordinances too, so our rules are clear, fair, and strong enough to protect our neighborhoods — without punishing people who are trying to do things right.
Short-term rentals bring both benefits and challenges. They generate valuable tax revenue. But they also bring more visitors — and while most tourists are good guests, they aren’t always as invested in being good neighbors. Our goal should be to strike a fair balance that respects property rights, protects our neighborhoods, and supports the quality of life that makes Ivins special. The goal is to ensure that short-term rentals are an asset to our community by making sure they fit Ivins’ character and expectations.
Short-term rentals bring both benefits and challenges. They generate valuable tax revenue. But they also bring more visitors — and while most tourists are good guests, they aren’t always as invested in being good neighbors. Our goal should be to strike a fair balance: to respect property rights, protect our neighborhoods, and ensure that short-term rentals are truly an asset by fitting Ivins’ character and expectations.
No decisions have been made yet, and our city attorney is reviewing options. But this is a conversation we need to have soon, and I’ll keep you posted as it moves forward.
Let me know about Ivins issues that are important to you. Please email me with your concerns, ideas, suggestions, and recommendations. Sign up for monthly updates (click here)
Recent “Development” Articles
- SITLA Affordable Housing Proposal — Great Goal, Challenging Location
PDF 📄As noted in previous articles, the Utah Trust Lands Administration (SITLA) is moving forward with a proposal to build 254 small,… - Making Land Use Changes Work for the Community
PDF 📄Cities across Utah are feeling pressure from the State Legislature to help provide more affordable housing options. At the same time,… - Red Mountain Resort Development: Update 2
PDF 📄Update – 10/17/25: The City Council last night approved a revised development agreement for Red Mountain Resort. The plan now allows… - Closer to Affordable Housing Off Hwy 91
PDF 📄The Trust Lands Administration (commonly known as SITLA) has selected a developer for its parcel of land just off Hwy 91 next to… - Is The Housing Debate Comparing Apples To Watermelons?
PDF 📄The Legislature’s focus on housing affordability is understandable. Home prices have far outpaced incomes across Utah, and that’s a real challenge…
