The State Legislature gave cities a little more enforcement power this year through House Bill 256, which outlines clear steps cities can take when short-term rentals (STRs) operate in zones where they aren’t allowed. This includes issuing warnings, requesting that online listings be removed, and imposing fines if violations aren’t corrected. The Legislature didn’t give us as much as I had hoped, but something is better than nothing.
Ivins allows STRs in a few designated overlay areas, as well as in Resort Commercial, Resort Mixed Use, and Commercial Resort areas. But they are not allowed in most residential parts of the city.
Here’s the catch: while Ivins has a good system for deciding where STRs are permitted, our current code doesn’t clearly spell out how short-term rentals must operate — things like proof of taxes being paid, garbage removal standards, or manager accountability.
Washington City recently updated its STR ordinances to deal with similar gaps — adding new requirements like posting emergency contacts inside the rental, requiring annual proof of transient room tax payments, and making sure STR managers are properly licensed and close by.
I believe it’s time for Ivins to review and update our short-term rental ordinances too, so our rules are clear, fair, and strong enough to protect our neighborhoods — without punishing people who are trying to do things right.
Short-term rentals bring both benefits and challenges. They generate valuable tax revenue. But they also bring more visitors — and while most tourists are good guests, they aren’t always as invested in being good neighbors. Our goal should be to strike a fair balance that respects property rights, protects our neighborhoods, and supports the quality of life that makes Ivins special. The goal is to ensure that short-term rentals are an asset to our community by making sure they fit Ivins’ character and expectations.
Short-term rentals bring both benefits and challenges. They generate valuable tax revenue. But they also bring more visitors — and while most tourists are good guests, they aren’t always as invested in being good neighbors. Our goal should be to strike a fair balance: to respect property rights, protect our neighborhoods, and ensure that short-term rentals are truly an asset by fitting Ivins’ character and expectations.
No decisions have been made yet, and our city attorney is reviewing options. But this is a conversation we need to have soon, and I’ll keep you posted as it moves forward.
Let me know about Ivins issues that are important to you. Please email me with your concerns, ideas, suggestions, and recommendations. Sign up for monthly updates (click here)
Recent “Development” Articles
- Having a Voice in the Future of Ivins
PDF 📄I was going to call this article “What Mojave Village Can Teach Us About Working Together to Protect Our Community,” but… - Mojave Village: A Big Proposal Moving Quickly
PDF 📄Ivins is considering a significant new development called Mojave Village, approximately 64 acres near Guy Lane and Fitness Way. The proposal… - Mojave Village: Your Questions, Concerns & My Responses
PDF 📄Since I posted information about the proposed Mojave Village development, I’ve received more than 100 emails and a lot of social… - A New Plan for 64 Acres in Ivins: Mojave Village
PDF 📄There are two important public hearings this week regarding Mojave Village, a proposed development of approximately 64 acres near Guy Lane… - SITLA Responses to Resident Concerns
PDF 📄I have received a number of emails from residents opposed to the annexation of the SITLA land just off Hwy 91…
