The Planning Commission started to discuss changing requirements for exterior building colors at its June 15th meeting. Currently, Ivins requires building exterior colors to be muted, earth tones. It appeared that members of the Planning Commission, except for Lance Anderson, were in favor of loosening color requirements to allow for much lighter colors.
At their last meeting, Commissioner Anderson thought that people looking to use much lighter colors are focused on their own investment, not the investment their neighbors have made which could be negatively impacted. He noted that is the reason ordinances exist, to protect both investments. He suggested that at least the homes around the perimeter of a new subdivision use colors that are compatible with surrounding homes. He also felt that relaxing the color requirements was a step in the wrong direction.
In a way, the discussion is mute for a lot of single-family development. The State has now eliminated the ability for cities to regulate many building design elements, including building color, for one- and two-family homes. Ivins can still regulate design elements for townhomes, multifamily and commercial development. And HOAs can regulate design elements, including building color, in their CC&Rs.
However, if a developer of a subdivision enters into a development agreement with the City, that agreement can include design element requirements. Development agreements typically come into play when developers look for density bonuses. So, if a subdivision developer isnât looking for anything extra, like density, the developer will not have to meet the Cityâs design requirements.
But City Manager Dale Coulam suggested a possible solution. He said the City could change the subdivision ordinance to require development agreements for all new subdivisions. That way the City could still control design requirements.
Lance said he lived in Ivins when there were no rules. Over the past twenty years we created rules for building design and colors, creating value for property owners and changing the way the city is looked at for the better. Now the State Legislature, controlled by developers who donât care about our values and just come in and build and leave, doesnât care what our values are or what we have tried to accomplish. So, we have to take a stand.
Commissioners will continue this discussion at their next meeting and there will ultimately be a public hearing before they make any recommendation to the City Council.
Please share your comments and tell me about other Ivins issues I have not addressed in recent posts. CONTACT ME
Recent “Development” posts
- Having a Voice in the Future of IvinsPDF đI was going to call this article âWhat Mojave Village Can Teach Us About Working Together to Protect Our Community,â but that’s a bit much for a title! In my September âMonthly Ivins Updateâ email to residents, I asked residents to email me with their thoughts about Mojave Village. More than 200 took the…
- Mojave Village: A Big Proposal Moving QuicklyPDF đIvins is considering a significant new development called Mojave Village, approximately 64 acres near Guy Lane and Fitness Way. The proposal includes 369 units: 160 Resort Commercial townhomes that could be used as short-term rentals, nearly 200 smaller-lot single-family homes, and estate lots of an acre or more. That’s a lot to consider. At…
- Mojave Village: Your Questions, Concerns & My ResponsesPDF đSince I posted information about the proposed Mojave Village development, I’ve received more than 100 emails and a lot of social media comments. Some are strongly opposed. Some ask good questions. Some raise concerns I share. Some reflect understandable misunderstandings about what is actually being proposed, which is one reason I think providing more…
- A New Plan for 64 Acres in Ivins: Mojave VillagePDF đThere are two important public hearings this week regarding Mojave Village, a proposed development of approximately 64 acres near Guy Lane and Fitness Way. The proposal would change the Land Use and Zoning Maps to allow a mix of housing types and Resort Commercial development. The proposed plan includes: 160 Resort Commercial townhomes that…
- SITLA Responses to Resident ConcernsPDF đI have received a number of emails from residents opposed to the annexation of the SITLA land just off Hwy 91 next to the Indigo Trails neighborhood and the proposed âAnasazi Commonsâ attainable housing development (previously called Anasazi Ridge). After reviewing all of the emails Iâve received so far, I found 37 different concerns…