The Planning Commission discussed relaxing the City’s requirements for the size of attached garages for single-family homes at its June 1, 2021 meeting. Currently, the square footage of attached garages is limited to 50% of the home’s footprint for homes on less than one-half acre, 60% for homes on one-half to just under one acre, and 70% on homes on one acre or larger lots.
This has become an issue because developers are finding a demand from home buyers for garages that can accommodate their recreational vehicles or motor homes in addition to their cars. So, this is also creating a second issue, garage height. Currently, Ivins does not allow an attached garage to be higher than the home. So, we are seeing new one-story homes being built higher than they would be normally, to match the extra garage height needed. You can decide for yourself if that’s aesthetically pleasing or not. The home buyers appear content.
Commissioners were mixed on whether to change the current requirement. Some suggested just two tiers: 60% garage area for lots under one acre and 70% for more than an acre. They discussed possibly adding a maximum garage size. And Commissioner Anderson commented that the key is to ensure that the home plus garage still looks like a home and not a home attached to a commercial structure. In other words, keep everything on a human scale.
In a way, the discussion is mute for a lot of single-family development. The State has now eliminated the ability for cities to regulate many building design elements, including building color, for one- and two-family homes. However, if a developer of a subdivision enters into a development agreement with the City, that agreement can include design element requirements. Development agreements typically come into play when developers look for density bonuses. And HOAs can regulate design elements, including garage size, in their CC&Rs.
This discussion will be continued at the next meeting.
Note: Please let me know if I have misunderstood anything in this discussion. Also, please share your comments and tell me about other Ivins issues I have not addressed in recent posts. CONTACT ME
Recent “Development” posts
- The Housing Debate Is Comparing Apples To WatermelonsPDF 📄The Legislature’s focus on housing affordability is understandable. Home prices have far outpaced incomes across Utah, and that’s a real challenge for families. But in trying to solve that one problem, lawmakers are putting on blinders to everything else that good planning protects. Housing isn’t built in a vacuum. When the Legislature’s only lens…
- Utah’s Housing Plan: Hope or Worry?PDF 📄The State released a draft Housing Strategic Plan last week, asking cities to provide feedback before it’s finalized and presented to the Legislature. (Download the Plan) I’ll admit, I approached my review of the Plan with low expectations. In recent years, housing policy discussions at the state level have leaned toward mandates, one-size-fits-all rules…
- Red Mountain Resort: What’s Next For Ivins?PDF 📄At last week’s City Council meeting, Black Desert Resort presented a proposed development agreement for the Red Mountain Resort property. The concept is to redevelop the existing resort on 56.5 acres with up to 500 “visitor lodging” units managed as part of a destination resort, plus an unspecified amount of related commercial space. About…
- Ongoing Blasting at Black Desert ResortPDF 📄Black Desert Resort is currently conducting regular blasting to excavate lava rock for an underground parking structure. The blasting occurs at least a couple times a week and has been underway for several months, with at least a few more months to go. During this afternoon’s blast, I was a few hundred feet from…
- My Take on Growth, Roads, Water, & MorePDF 📄Robert MacFarlane, an Ivins resident who pays a lot of attention to local issues and hosts the 435 Podcast sent a questionnaire to all city council candidates in the county. I wrote detailed responses to all seven questions, but they were too big and blew up his online survey form. So I redid those responses as…